Lion drinking

Mountain Lions in the State of Arizona

Trophy hunters were allowed to kill more than 350 mountain lions in Arizona during the 2019-2020 hunting season, which lasts nine months. While the Arizona Game and Fish Department acknowledges that it’s difficult to get an accurate estimate of the state’s lion population, the department guesses there are 2,000 – 2,700 lions in the state. The true population is likely lower than that.

Click on the tabs below to learn more about mountain lion policy, laws, alerts, and more!

History

Bounty Period

Like most states, Arizona’s first lion management plan took the form of paying a bounty for every lion killed where the pelt was turned over to authorities. This program continued in Arizona until roughly fifty years ago.

History of Mountain Lion Management in Arizona

In 1919, mountain lions in Arizona were classified as a “predatory animal” by the territorial legislature and a bounty of $50 was paid for each one killed. While Arizona reclassified mountain lions as “big game” animals in 1970, the bounty law remained on the books as a non-funded program until its repeal in 1990. During the 51 years Arizona’s mountain lion bounty was in effect, 7,723 mountain lions were killed and turned in to the government for the bounty.

At the same time that lions were listed as big game animals, the Arizona legislature revised Statue 17-302 to allow the killing of mountain lions for depredation purposes. In 1990, the state’s depredation policy changed to require that there be an actual loss of livestock prior to lethal removal of mountain lions.

In the year 2000, Arizona Game and Fish Department established a wildlife predation management policy. Among other things, this policy in part called for killing individual mountain lions or suppressing resident mountain lion populations where ungulate numbers (deer, elk, big horn sheep, etc.) are considered to be below AZGFD management goals, or when conducting transplants of species such as bighorn sheep and pronghorn. According to this policy, the Department can increase the number of lions killed by hunters or trappers, or authorize department personnel and other individuals to kill mountain lions to achieve these policy ends. For several years now AZGFD has consistently increased quotas and bag limits in several of their Game Management Units (GMUs) in an effort to reduce the resident population of mountain lions, citing concern about the health and well-being of bighorn sheep and mule deer populations.

In its 2001 Strategic Plan, AZGFD stated that the goals of its mountain lion management strategy were to “manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution as an important part of Arizona’s fauna [and to] provide mountain lion hunting (including hunting with dogs) and other related recreational opportunities.” The department’s stated objectives are to:

  • “maintain an annual harvest of between 250 to 300 mountain lions (including depredation takes),
  • provide recreational opportunities for 3,000 to 6,000 trophy hunters per year; and
  • maintain existing occupied habitat, and maintain the present range of mountain lions in Arizona.”

In 2003, Arizona Game and Fish Department, in accordance with its wildlife predation management policy, proposed intensive mountain lion removal projects in several western Game Management Units in conjunction with their bighorn sheep relocation program. Arizona currently (2012) has a year-round trophy hunting season on mountain lions, as well as predator “contest shoots,” in which prizes are given for shooting as many coyotes, foxes, bobcats, etc. as possible.

Arizona’s Killing Fields

Based on a lion-mortality density model developed by the Mountain Lion Foundation, Arizona averages 0.45 mountain lions reported killed by humans for every 100 square miles of habitat. The eleven western state average is 0.65. Using MLF’s mortality ranking system, Arizona ranks 8th amongst the 11 western states studied by MLF in reported human-caused mountain lion mortalities.

A review of average annual mountain lion mortality numbers at the Game Management Unit (GMU) level clearly defines Arizona’s diagonal band of habitat with the highest concentration of mountain lion kills located in the southeastern quarter of the state. Game Management Units 27, 28, 31, and 32 in particular stand out with their disproportionate annual average mountain lion mortality numbers. An analysis of these GMUs from 1997 to 2001 shows a higher proportion of depredation related lion mortalities than experienced elsewhere in the state. This coupled with trophy hunting kills raised the annual average mountain lion mortality numbers to levels not seen elsewhere within the state.

Using MLF’s mortality ranking system, the top five Game Management Units in Arizona where human-caused mountain lion mortalities were greatest were numbers 27, 31, 32, 17 and 21. From 1997 to 2001, these GMUs accounted for 485 human-caused mountain lion mortalities. During this time period, these GMUs were responsible for 29 percent of human-caused mountain lion mortalities while encompassing only 9 percent of Arizona Game and Fish Department’s mountain lion habitat.

Game Management Unit-27 is ranked as Arizona’s number one killing field of mountain lions with an average mortality density rating of 1.8–almost twice the study average. From 1997 to 2001, GMU-27 averaged 25 human-caused mountain lion mortalities per year and accounted for 7 percent of all the state’s human-caused mountain lion mortalities during that time period.

Status

In 2003, AZGFD estimated that there were approximately 1,000 to 2,500 mountain lions on their lands. At that time, wildlife biologist D. J. Schubert conducted an in-depth analysis of AZGFD’s management policies and mortality data and concluded that their mountain lion population estimates were suspect because:

  • projections of suitable mountain lion habitat are not based on defensible biological information;
  • projections are subjectively determined by regional personnel;
  • projections can be (and reportedly have been) altered to increase population estimates;
  • projections assume that mountain lion habitat is saturated to its highest biological level; and
  • projections rely on estimates of mountain lion densities that are higher than the reported literature.

As far as we know, AZGFD has not yet addressed Dr. Schubert’s concerns. In a strategic planning report AZGFD describes the state’s mountain lion population as “robust” and estimated the animal’s population level to be between 2,500 to 3,000. AZGFD explains the population increase as the result of an abundance of deer and discounts other lion population estimates as being too conservative.

The Mountain Lion Foundation agrees with Dr. Schubert that the state’s estimate of mountain lion numbers are overly optimistic and are more closed based on satisfying demand or mountain lion hunting opportunities than they are on puma biology. Until an acceptable, peer-reviewed study of Arizona’s lion population is produced to change our opinion, MLF estimates that state’s lion population to be approximately 1,750 animals. Of this number, an estimated 1/3rd consists of kittens and subadults younger than three-years old.

Arizona currently uses what AZGFD calls Open Hunting to manage the state’s mountain lion population. “Open hunting” allows the killing of an unlimited numbers of mountain lions of either sex in some areas during the legal hunting season. This season was extended from 9 months to year-round in 2012. Arizona is also one of only a few states to still allow hunting of lions at night, a practice dangerous to both mountain lions, hunters, and other outdoor recreationalists.

Human/Lion Conflicts in Arizona

Arizona’s human population is expected to double to about 12 million by the year 2050, and the state’s urban areas will continue to expand into and overlap with mountain lion habitat. A Mountain Lion Action Plan was developed in 2004 to address the issue of human/lion conflicts and provide response guidance for AZGFD field personnel. The plan categorizes conflicts as sighting, encounter, incident, or attack based on acceptable or unacceptable behaviors by mountain lions. Department responses are guided by the action plan for each category. Reports of all lion/human conflicts are entered into a centralized Human-Wildlife Interaction Database.

Public Opinion about Lions in Arizona

In the 2005 Attitudes Toward Urban Wildlife Among Residents of Phoenix and Tucson survey, residents were asked whether or not mountain lions are “dangerous:” 44 percent agreed and 44 percent disagreed. Of those respondents, only 21 percent think that mountain lions are a threat to personal safety, while 72 percent believe they are not a threat. In the survey, 80 percent of the public accepted destroying a mountain lion that is a “threat to human safety” or is an “established threat to pets and livestock.” According to Arizona residents in the survey, 33 percent think the mountain lion population is declining, 15 percent think mountain lions are endangered, 1 percent think they are extinct, and only 19 percent think the population is stable.

When asked about controlling mountain lions, 65 percent of the public found it acceptable “to protect endangered or threatened wildlife” and 55 percent found it acceptable “to protect wildlife populations that are declining.” However, less than 50 percent found it acceptable “to increase numbers of big game animals.”

Human-Caused Mountain Lion Mortalities in Arizona

Between 1917 and 2014, at least 19,499 mountain lions have been killed by humans in Arizona, with almost 60 percent of these deaths occurring since mountain lions were classified as game animals in 1970. This fact is reflected in a 2009 AZGFD report which noted that the sale of mountain lion hunting tags had “annually increased from about 3,000 in 1990 to nearly 11,000 by 2007.

However this claim of an ever increasing constituency of lion hunters was repudiated in 2011 when AZGFD personnel attending the 2011 Mountain Lion Workshop (a national conference for state game agency personnel) voiced dissatisfaction over the declining number of mountain lion hunters. According to them, to offset this reduction, the agency was beginning to offer lion tags in multiple hunt license “combo” packages to interest the incidental deer or elk hunter that accidently came across a lion. Without the public (trophy hunters) to help AZGFD meet their management objective of killing off between 250 to 300 hundred lion each year, the representative indicated that there would need to be more administrative removal programs and eventually the Department may be forced to return to “the dark ages” and employ the public’s help to “balance wildlife populations” — implying a bounty program that would pay residents for their assistance in slaughtering mountain lions.

Frustration was also voiced by AZGDF personnel over the killing of bighorn sheep (a lion’s natural prey species) on the KofA (King of Arizona Mine) National Wildlife Refuge by the refuge’s resident mountain lions. Bighorn sheep (a highly valued trophy animal) raised at the refuge are raffled off to big game hunters for special hunts, and are also used to reestablish herds throughout the west. Being a money-making game species, the Department wanted to preemptively kill lions living on the refuge to provide a “safe haven” for those sheep. Due to public outcry this plan was scrapped in favor of lethally removing any lion that kills more than one of the refuge’s bighorn sheep over a six-month period.

Arizona Female Lion Mortalities

Similar to many other states that allow mountain lion hunting, Arizona provides protection to the state’s female lions, however these efforts may not be terribly effective. Though Arizona’s current hunting regulations restrict the killing of females with kittens, the “Open Hunting” harvest management approach limits the efficacy of this restriction. Many lion hunters have difficulty determining a lion’s sex with the animal in hand, ascertaining whether the animal is a lactating female at a distance is far more challenging. In addition, AZGFD is also considering targeting female lions for eradication in areas which include large scale livestock operations.

In 2003, the Arizona Game and Fish Department provided a gender breakdown of its mountain lion trophy hunting harvests for the years 1998 through 2001. During this 4-year period 48 percent (541) of the total trophy hunting mortalities were female mountain lions. A similar review took place for the years 2004 through 2007 where the percentage of females killed remained at 48 percent.

According to one major study (Anderson and Lindzey 2005), when adult females consistently comprise greater than 35 percent of the overall harvest, resident mountain lion abundance may be reduced. While noting this study in their 2009 Conservation Strategies Report, AZGFD ignores the study’s ramifications and denies any reduction in the state’s lion population. AZGFD insists their opinion of an increasing lion population justifies the need to increase overall mortality levels by whatever means.

Habitat

The state of Arizona encompasses 113,635 square miles (294,313 km2) of land. The main portion of Arizona’s best mountain lion habitat is distributed in a wide diagonal band stretching diagonally across the state.

The Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD) has the authority for managing mountain lions over 72,157 square miles (186,885 km2) of mountain lion habitat covering almost 63 percent of the state. Additionally, an unknown amount of mountain lion habitat falls under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service (4,200 sq mi. or 10,877 km2), or is located on tribal lands (29,500 sq. mi or 76,404 km2). Data on mountain lion population estimates, suitable habitat, and human-caused mountain lion mortalities for these 33,700 square miles is unavailable to MLF at this time.

Law

Species Status

The species is classified as a game mammal, along with deer, elk, bear, pronghorn antelope, bighorn sheep, bison, peccary, tree squirrels, and cottontail rabbits. The species is also classified as big game, along with wild turkey, deer, elk, bear, pronghorn antelope, bighorn sheep, bison, peccary, and bear.

Rather than directly protecting animals, Arizona’s endangered species law merely creates a fund that is to be spent in preservation of threatened habitats.

State Law

Generally, treatment of wildlife in the State of Arizona is governed by the Arizona Revised Statutes – the state’s collection of its laws, updated at the end of each legislative cycle. Arizona also collects its department regulations in the Arizona Administrative Code. Since our summary below may not be completely up to date, you should be sure to review the most current laws and regulations for the State of Arizona.

You can check the statutes directly at a state-managed website: http://www.azleg.gov/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp These statutes are searchable. Be sure to use the name “mountain lion” to accomplish your searches.

The Legislature

The Arizona state legislature is a bicameral legislature consisting of a lower chamber – the House of Representatives – and an upper chamber – the Senate. The House of Representatives is made up of 60 members, and the Senate is made up of 30 members. Members of both chambers serve 2-year terms and are limited to four consecutive terms. If you do not know in which legislative district you live, Arizona maintains this website to help you find your district. If you already know in which district you live, you can contact your legislator by using the House of Representatives’ membership roster and the Senate’s membership roster.

The legislature meets annually with the session beginning on the second Monday of January and normally running until late June. The governor may call special sessions when he/she feels it necessary. During special sessions, the legislature may only pass laws related to the subject for which the governor has called the session.

State Regulation

Arizona’s wildlife regulations can be found in Chapter 4 of the Natural Resources section of the Arizona Administrative Code. The Arizona Game and Fish Commission sets the regulations found in that chapter.

Arizona Game and Fish Commission

The Arizona Game and Fish Commission is a five-member board appointed by the governor. Members serve five-year terms, which expire on the third Monday in January of their final year. No two members may be residents of the same county, and no more than three members may belong to the same political party. The commission sets Arizona’s regulations for managing wildlife and fisheries. It also regulates watercraft and off-highway vehicle use.

Arizona Game and Fish Department

The Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD) enforces the state’s wildlife laws and the Game and Fish Commission’s regulations. The AZGFD is a stand-alone department within the executive branch of the Arizona state government.

The Arizona Game and Fish Department reviews, revises, and reports on mountain lion conservation strategies when the Game and Fish Commission directs it to do so. As of 2014, the latest report appears to be the 2009 Mountain Lion and Bear Conservation Strategies Report. The report was written by “wildlife scientists and managers,” two of whom were not employed by the AZGFD. The commission takes no action on the report itself but can implement its recommendations in future public sessions. There do not appear to be written guidelines as to when a new report is to be issued.

Hunting Law

Hunting of mountain lions is allowed in the State of Arizona. The regulations governing “recreational” hunting of mountain lions specify 76 units. AZGFD’s hunting regulations booklet states that mountain lion season runs from July 1 to June 30.

Hound hunting is allowed.

Arizona allows the hunting of mountain lions with centerfire rifles, muzzleloading rifles, all rifles using black powder or synthetic black powder, centerfire handguns, handguns using black powder or synthetic black powder, shotguns using slugs or shot, bows with a standard pull of 30 or more pounds, and crossbows with a minimum draw weight of 125 pounds. Arizona also allows hunting with the assistance of artificial light as long as the light is not attached to or operated from a motor vehicle, motorized watercraft, watercraft under sail, or floating object towed by a motorized watercraft or a watercraft under sail.

Arizona prohibits hunting spotted kittens and females accompanied by kittens. However, Arizona does not appear to set season limits for mountain lion harvest. Hunters are allowed to take one mountain lion per year except in units with a “multiple bag limit.” In units with a multiple bag limit, hunters may take one mountain lion per day until the multiple bag limit is reached. Once the multiple bag limit has been reached, the season remains open and reverts to the calendar year bag limit of one mountain lion.

Public Safety Law

Arizona law allows any person to kill wildlife “in self-defense or in defense of another person if it is immediately necessary to protect oneself or to protect the other person.” That person must notify the Arizona Game and Fish Department within five days. No portion of the animal may be retained sold, or removed from the site without permission from the AZGFD.

Depredation Law

Depredation law in Arizona is monitored by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. The law specifies that a landowner or lessee whose livestock has been attacked by a mountain lion may dispatch of the depredating lion with leg hold traps without teeth, leg snares, firearms, and “other legal hunting weapons and devices.” After beginning to pursue a mountain lion, a livestock operator must notify the AZGFD within five days. The AZGFD may request that the livestock operator provide them with reasonable evidence that the livestock was attacked by a mountain lion. After killing a lion, the operator may not keep any portion of the carcass without permission from the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. The law also states that no lion taken alive may be kept in captivity.

Owners of domestic animals do not appear to be required to take any specified steps to protect their pets or livestock. There also does not appear to be a government-funded compensation program for losses of domestic animals to mountain lions.

Trapping

Mountain lions may not be trapped for fur in Arizona. The laws governing trapping in Arizona specify that licensed trappers may trap predatory, nongame, and fur-bearing species. Arizona classifies mountain lions as game mammals and does not include them on its list of either predatory or fur-bearing species.

Poaching

Poaching law in the State of Arizona provides some protection of mountain lions in law, but only as a deterrent. It is rare for penalties to be sufficiently harsh to keep poachers from poaching again. Anyone who takes a mountain lion during a closed season, in an area closed to mountain lion hunting, through the use of an unlawful device or method, in excess of the bag limit, or possesses or transports a mountain lion or parts of a mountain lion that was unlawfully taken is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor. A class 2 misdemeanor is punishable by up to 4 months of imprisonment. Anyone who knowingly takes a mountain lion during a closed season or who knowingly possesses, transports, or buys any big game that was unlawfully taken during a closed season is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor, which is punishable by up to 6 months of imprisonment. Finally, any person who barters, sells, or offers for sale any mountain lion or a part of a mountain lion taken unlawfully is guilty of a class 6 felony. The duration of imprisonment for a felony is determined by the court. In addition to the criminal proceedings, the Arizona Game and Fish Commission or any of its officers may bring a civil lawsuit against the poacher, seeking a minimum of $1,500 in damages per lion.

Action

There are currently no Action Alerts for Arizona. Check back often for updates!

Map

Coming soon!

Library

Arizona Cougar Files Sorted by Type

Scientific Research

  • Bateman, G., Ockenfels, R.,Thompson, R. (1988). The Third Mountain Lion Workshop.
  • Beier, P. (2001). 111 Years of Puma Attacks on Humans
  • Bischoff-Mattson, Z., & Mattson, D. (2009). Effects of Simulated Mountain Lion Caching on Decomposition of Ungulate Carcasses. Western North American Naturalist, 69(3), 343–350.
  • Brown, D. (1984). ARIZONA Dave Brown, 9–12.
  • Casey et al 2002 REPORT Activity Patterns, Movements, and Diet of Mountain Lions in an Urbanized Environment. (n.d.).
  • Casey, A. L., Krausman, P. R., Shaw, W. W., & Brosseau, M. (2002). Activity Patterns , Movements , and Diet of Mountain Lions in an Urbanized Environment, (September).
  • Casey, A. L., Krausman, P. R., Shaw, W. W., & Shaw, H. G. (2005). Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Mountain Lions: A Public Survey of Residents Adjacent to Saguaro National Park, Arizona. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(June 2014), 29–38.
  • Connected, A., & Related, A. (1892). Help Sierra Club Protect Wilderness in Grand Canyon National Park.
  • Cunningham, S. C., Gustavson, C. R., Ballard, W. B., & Ballard, B. (2012). Diet selection of mountain lions in southeastern Arizona, 52(3), 202–207.
  • Dickson, B. G., Roemer, G. W., McRae, B. H., & Rundall, J. M. (2013). Models of regional habitat quality and connectivity for pumas (Puma concolor) in the Southwestern United States.
  • Freeman, W., Valley, C., & Jack, F. (2012). Hunt Arizona 2012 Edition.
  • Haynes et al 2002 Results of 2002 Mountain Lion (Puma Concolor) Track Surveys in Saguaro National Park, Tucson Mountain District. (n.d.).
  • Haynes Swann 2002 Summary of 2001-2002 Mountain Lion (Puma Concolor) Monitoring in Saguaro National Park, Tucson Mountain district. (n.d.).
  • Interior, D. of the. (1940). United States Department of the Interior. Journal of the National Medical Association, 32(1), 38. Retrieved from
  • Kluever, B. M., Breck, S. W., Howery, L. D., Krausman, P. R., David, L., Ecology, S. R., … Bergman, L. (2015). Allen Press Society for Range Management Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation , Social Interactions , and Environmental Factors
  • Leslie, E. (2001). Mountain lion-human interactions on the Colorado Palteau: the effects of human use areas on mountain lion movements, behavior, and activity patterns. Crossing Boundaries in Park Management: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands
  • March, C. (2002). Selected comments of organizations and individuals on the Arizona Game & Fish Department ’ s Bighorn Sheep / Mountain Lion Project.
  • Mattson, D. (2007). Mountain Lions of the Flagstaff Uplands 2003-2006 Progress Report. USGS
  • Mc Kinney, T., Wakeling, B. F., & Dell, J. C. O. (2006). Mountain lion depredation harvests in Arizona, 1976–2005, 303–314.
  • Mckinney, T. E. D., Game, A., Road, W. G., Smith, T. W., & Jr, J. C. (2003). Evaluation of Factors Potentially Influencing a Desert Bighorn Sheep Population
  • Meadow, B. (2004). Decisionresearch, 92101(619).
  • Moskowitz, K., & Romaniello, C. (2002). Assessing The Full Cost of the Federal Grazing Program, (October).
  • Naidu, A., Fitak, R. R., Munguia-Vega, A., & Culver, M. (2012). Novel primers for complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequencing in mammals. Molecular Ecology Resources, 12(2), 191–196.
  • Naidu, A., Smythe, L. a., Thompson, R. W., & Culver, M. (2011). Genetic Analysis of Scats Reveals Minimum Number and Sex of Recently Documented Mountain Lions. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 2(1), 106–111.
  • Naidu, A., Smythe, L., Thompson, R., & Culver, M. (n.d.). Minimum Number , Sex , and Diet of Recently Documented Mountain Lions on Kofa National Wildlife Refuge , Arizona, 4.
  • Phelps, J., Game, A., & Road, W. G. (n.d.). STATUS REPORT ON MOUNTAIN LIONS IN ARIZONA, 1–3.
  • Profile, P. (2013). Grand Canyon, 3–7.
  • Rachael, J., Nadeau, S., & Compton, B. (2010). Mountain lion management plan 2002 – 2010, (March 2002), 3–5.
  • Renesse, L. D. W. A., & Duivenbode, V. (1999). The taxonomic and conservation status of. Library, 15(5), 1–13.
  • Ruyle, G., Smith, L., & Ogden, P. (1996). Strategies for Managing Grazing Allotments on Public Lands, 47–54.
  • Schubert 2003 Summarization and Evaluation of Mountain Lion Management Practices and Procedures in Arizona. (n.d.).
  • Service, W., & Game, A. (2010). Cat Project of the Month – April 2010 Minimum number and diet assessment of recently documented pumas at Kofa National Wildlife Refuge in Arizona to address predation management for desert bighorn sheep conservation Kofa NWR has made significant progress , (April).
  • Service, W., National, K., Refuge, W., & Game, A. (2009). Environmental Assessment for Limiting Mountain Lion Predation on Desert Bighorn Sheep on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge. Wilderness, (May).
  • Snakes, V., & Lions, M. (2001). History of Mountain Lion Management, (Table 3), 7–8.
  • Society, W. (2016). Use of Road Track Counts as Indices of Mountain Lion Presence
  • Thompson, R., Game, A., & Biologist, L. C. (1989). Arizona Mountain Lion Status Report, 85–90.
  • Vacariu, K. (n.d.). Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network Borderlands Habitat Fragmentation and, 353–356.
  • Winslow, R. E. M., Phoenix, K. R. D., Pat, E., Flagstaff, M., Yuma, J. R. A., & Tucson, J. W. H. (2014). Hunt Arizona 2014 Edition.

Agency Reports

  • AZDFG (2007) Press Release: Game and Fish to Conduct Mountain Lion Presentation.
  • AZDFG (2012) Mountain lion harvest data
  • AZDFG. (2001). Wildlife 2006.
  • AZDFG. (2003). 2002-2003 Arizona Hunt Regulation Changes For 2002-2003, 4–8.
  • AZDFG. (2004). Tucson , Arizona Sponsored by Arizona Game and Fish Department Executive Summary Organization of the Report The Workshop Funding Ideas Appendix A — Overall Results Appendix B — Public Comment: Individual Responses Appendix C — Public Comment: Organizati, 1–22.
  • AZDFG. (2005). ATTITUDES TOWARD URBAN WILDLIFE AMONG RESIDENTS OF PHOENIX AND TUCSON , ARIZONA Conducted for the Arizona Game and Fish Department ATTITUDES TOWARD URBAN WILDLIFE AMONG RESIDENTS OF PHOENIX AND TUCSON , ARIZONA.
  • AZDFG. (2007). Kofa Mountains Complex Predation Management Plan, (April).
  • AZDFG. (2012). Wildlife 2012, (August 2006), 85023.
  • AZDFG. (2013). 2013-14 Arizona Hunting Regulations, (800).
  • AZDFG. (n.d.). Arizona Game and Fish Department Action Plan For Minimizing and Responding to LionlIluman.
  • AZDFG (2006). Kofa National Wildlife Refuge Environmental Assessment.
  • AZDFG (n.d.). Survey, Harvest and Hunt Datafor Big and Small Game.

Legal

Other

  • AGFD Freeman 2005 Mountain Lion Tracking Goes High Tech.
  • Arizona Daily Star 2004 Commission Agrees to Moratorium on Lion Shootings.
  • Arizona Daily Star Beal 2004 Suprise End to Sabino Lion Story.
  • Arizona Daily Star Beal 2005 2 Animal Activist convicted of Disrupting Mountain Lion Hunt in Sabino Canyon.
  • Arizona Daily Star Dalenberg 2008 Mountain Lion Killed After Menacing Hiker.
  • Arizona Daily Star McCombs 2007 Border Patrol Agent Escapes Charging Mountain Lion Unharmed.
  • Arizona Daily Star Nienstedt 2007 Fish and Wildife Service Mustn’t Allow Hunting of Mountain Lions.
  • Arizona Daily Sun 2004 Agency Votes to Protect Cougar Kittens.
  • Arizona Republic 2008 New Cubs Eli, Brady, on Prowl at Phoenix Zoo.
  • Arizona Republic Kelley 2005 Mountain Lion Kills 20 Emus, Still at Large.
  • Arizona Republic Leung 2008 10-year-old Calm as Lion Attacked, Grampa Recalls.
  • Arizona Republic Leung 2008 Rabid Mountain Lion Attacks El Mirage Boy.
  • Arizona Republic Nolan 2005 Lion Tests State’s New Protocol.
  • Arizona Republic Nolan 2005 Mountain Lion Monitored with New State Guidelines.
  • Arizona Republic Nolan 2005 SW Wildlife Hires Educational Director.
  • Arizona Republic Pitzl 2004 Development vs.
  • Arizona Republic Purtill 2007 Biologist Found Dead, Plague is Likely Cause.
  • Arizona Star 2007 Wildlife Refuge Postpones Plans for Mountain Lion Hunt.
  • Arizona Sun Cole 2005 And Then There Were 3.
  • Arizona Sun Cole 2005 No Lion, Students Learn About Living with Cougars.
  • Arizona Sun Cole 2005 Research Cougar Shot by Hunter.
  • Arizona Sun Cole 2005 Spot a Mountain Lion, Here’s What to Do.
  • Arizona Sun Muller 2004 Mountain Lion Hunt Turns Up Two Bobcats.
  • Associated Press 2008 Arizona to Stop Killing Cougars.
  • Associated Press 2008 Boy Saved From Rabid Mountain Lion.
  • Associated Press 2008 Mountain Lion Killed for Targeting Bighorn Sheep.
  • Associated Press 2008 Mountain Lion That Stalked Hiker Killed.
  • Associated Press 2008 Officials Keeping Eye On Mountain Lions Near Tucson.
  • Associated Press 2008 Rabid Mountain Lion Shot North of Phoenix After Attacking Boy.
  • Associated Press Billeaud 2007 Arizona Biologist Likely Died of Plague.
  • AZGFD Partners in Kofa National Wildlife Refuge Bighorn Sheep Restoration Effort Announce Moratorium on Mountain Lion Control.
  • Bowers 2008 Planners Consider Animal Movements in Road Plans.
  • CNN Dorin 2008 Boarder-Fence Dispute Snares Rare Jaguars.
  • Comments on 10 Year Old Attacked by Mountain Lion.
  • Cronkite News Service Duran 2007 Legislative Memorial Calls for State to Manage Bighorn Sheep in Kofa Range.
  • Cronkite News Service Novak 2007 Animals Often Pay Price When They Become Exotic Pets.
  • Daily Courier Dodde 2007 Wildlife Protocol.
  • Daily Courier Dodder 2007 Game and Fish To Redirect, Add Wildlife.
  • East Valley Tribune Kullman 2005 Scientist Aims to Meld Wildlife, Growing East Valley.
  • Environment News Service 2003 Animal Rights Groups Sue to Protect Mountain Lions.
  • Fox 11 News Roberts 2008 Mountain Lion Spotted in Madera Canyon.
  • High Country News Davis 2004 Cougar Hunt Creates Uproar.
  • High Country News Heim 2007 Making a Killing to Save Arizona’s Desert Bighorn Sheep.
  • High Country News Minard 2002 Cat Trouble Dogs Flagstaff.
  • Hull 2008 Using the Cougar.
  • KVOA Tuscon News4 2006 Refuge Could Open for First Time to Mountain Lion Hunters.
  • KVOA Tuscon News4 2008 Mountain Lion Warning for Popular Tuscon Trail.
  • KVOA Tuscon News4 2008 Mountain Lions Spotted in Tuscon.
  • Local10 2007 Biologist Dies of Plage In Arizona.
  • Mattson 2002 The Importance of Walnut Canyon National Monument as Habitat for Cougars (Puma Concolor) in an Urban Interface Environment.
  • Mattson 2002 Walnut Canyon 2002 David Mattson Email.
  • Mattson 2002 Walnut Canyon Cougar Report Form.
  • Medical News Today 2007 Plague Suspected in Death of Man in Arizona.
  • NewsChannel 3 Staff 2004 Protest Over Mountain Lions Leads to Arrest.
  • Phoenix Zoo 2008 Comments on Phoenix Zoo Looking to Name New Mountain Lion Cubs.
  • Phoenix Zoo 2008 Phoenix Zoo Looking To Name New Mountain Lion Cubs.
  • Roffe and Work 2005 EXCERPT Wildlife Health Disease Investigations pp197-202 of Techniques for Wildlife Investigations Management.pdf.
  • Sierra Vista Herald Hess 2007 Group Spending Weekend Tracking Mountain Lions on Fort.
  • The Fund For Animals 2003 Animal Protection Groups File Suit Over Arizona Mountain Lion Killing “Study.”
  • Tucson Citizen 2006 Attorney; Activists’ Trial Not About Lions.
  • Tucson Citizen 2007 Review Halts Planned Kofa Mountain Lion Hunt.
  • Tucson Citizen Copenhaver 2005 Boost Your Cougar Awareness.
  • Tucson Citizen Copenhaver 2005 Keeping Tabs on Lions.
  • Tuscon Citizen Cedillos 2004 Dozens Gather to Protest Mountain Lion Hunt in Sabino.
  • Tuscon Citizen Flick 2005 Three Indicted Again in Sabino Mountain Lion Hunt.
  • UPI 2008 Family Fights Off Rabid Mountain Lion.
  • Yuma Sun 2008 Comments on Officials Announce Killing of Mountain Lion.
  • Yuma Sun 2008 Officials Seek Input on Kofa Mountain Lions.
  • Yuma Sun Gilber 2008 Public Comment Period for Kofa Mountain Lion Plan Extended.
  • Yuma Sun Gilbert 2007 Group Critical of Mountain Lion Killing.
  • Yuma Sun Gilbert 2008 Officials Announce Killing of Mountain Lion.
  • Yuma Sun Rotstein 2007 Wildlife Refuge Postpones Plans for Mountain Lion Hunt.